At both the national and state level, Republicans mostly won seats they should have already held.
Read the column …
At both the national and state level, Republicans mostly won seats they should have already held.
Read the column …
A second term for Trump necessitates a recalibration by other democratic capitalist countries regarding their security interests.
There is a principled argument against newspapers endorsing candidates, although not the one made by Jeff Bezos.
Harris has given Democrats a good chance of retaining the presidency. That didn’t seem possible three months ago.
Trump’s tariff agenda in a second term would be much more far-reaching, and risky, than that in his first.
A legislative veto on regulations and emergency declarations would be compatible with the separation of powers principle. Requiring legislative approval for core executive branch functions isn’t.
An open primary fits and serves today’s electorate. Prop. 133, the MAGA Legislature’s competing measure, is either meaningless or pernicious.
Harris’s subsidies and tax preferences cannot compensate for the reduction in private sector investment capital her tax increases would cause.
The ballot measure has managed to stir up all the unhelpful emotions about immigration policy on both sides while doing virtually nothing substantive.
The anti-retention campaign illustrates the threat retention elections pose to an independent judiciary, but Prop. 137 has too many flaws to be an acceptable alternative.